Analysis of Twink Jones Gadama’s Critique on the Modern Church’s Shift Toward Profit



By Burnett Munthali

Twink Jones Gadama’s write-up on the modern church’s shift from a spiritual sanctuary to a profit-driven institution presents a sobering critique of what has become a troubling trend within religious organizations. Gadama argues that, while churches have traditionally been centers for faith, community support, and personal growth, they are increasingly focusing on financial gain, often to the detriment of their members. This analysis examines Gadama’s key points, reflecting on the implications of this shift and the need for a return to authentic spiritual leadership.



In his analysis, Gadama highlights a central paradox: churches are becoming businesses, while the very people who sustain them are burdened financially. One of the most telling examples he provides is the establishment of church-run schools. While these institutions often provide high-quality education, the costs for families are substantial. Tuition, admission fees, and other charges contribute to the church’s growing wealth, creating a reliable revenue stream. The same can be said for church-owned healthcare facilities, which, while providing essential services, also generate significant income for the church. This trend raises questions about whether congregants should still be obligated to give tithes and offerings while the church maintains multiple income streams.

Gadama’s point that “the church has become a business, and we’re the customers” resonates with many who feel that modern churches prioritize profit over people. This sentiment is echoed by Emily, a member who shared her frustration that spiritual support often seems secondary to financial demands. Gadama’s critique extends to the lifestyles of church leaders, who often enjoy luxury homes, expensive cars, and significant financial security while their congregants struggle to meet basic needs. This disparity challenges the church’s moral standing and leaves members questioning the sincerity of a faith that preaches humility but indulges in opulence.

The implications of this wealth-focused approach are profound. First, many church members feel disillusioned and exploited. When they see their leaders living luxuriously while they are urged to make sacrifices for the “greater good,” the sincerity of the church’s mission becomes questionable. This disillusionment has led to a decline in giving, as members become increasingly skeptical of the church’s intentions and reluctant to support an institution that appears to prioritize wealth accumulation over compassion and service.

Gadama makes a compelling case for the need for transparency. He argues that churches should openly disclose their finances, allowing members to see how their contributions are utilized. This approach could foster greater trust and accountability, reassuring congregants that their donations support genuine community initiatives rather than luxury lifestyles. Additionally, Gadama suggests that the church’s leaders must refocus on serving their congregants, putting people’s needs before financial ambitions. Without this fundamental shift, Gadama warns, the church risks losing its moral authority and spiritual relevance.

Finally, Gadama’s appeal for a return to the church’s core values is a timely reminder of its true mission: to offer guidance, compassion, and hope. The message from the Bible—”Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matthew 6:21)—captures this sentiment perfectly. The true wealth of the church should be found not in its bank accounts but in the spiritual growth and well-being of its members.

Gadama’s analysis underscores a necessary conversation about the role of the modern church in society. Churches must re-evaluate their priorities, striving to be true to their mission as sanctuaries for faith and compassion. By returning to these principles and ensuring that their focus remains on uplifting and supporting their members, churches can once again become beacons of hope and integrity within their communities.