By Twink Jones Gadama
President Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera’s latest move to preside over the groundbreaking ceremony for the construction of the Malawi Housing Corporation (MHC) Headquarters has raised eyebrows.
While the project is a significant milestone in the country’s infrastructure development, critics argue that the President’s involvement is a clear case of overstepping his bounds.
The ceremony, attended by the First Lady Monica Chakwera, Minister of Lands Deus Gumba, and Secretary to the President and Cabinet Colleen Zamba, marked the beginning of a new era for the MHC.
The state-of-the-art headquarters is expected to transform the face of Lilongwe and address office space challenges.
However, the question on everyone’s mind is: should the President be directly involved in such projects?
Critics argue that the President’s role is to provide strategic direction and oversight, not to micromanage projects that fall under the purview of line ministers.
In this case, the Minister of Lands should have been the one to launch the project, not the President.
By doing so, Chakwera is not only overstepping his bounds but also spending more government resources than necessary.
“This is a clear case of the President trying to take credit for everything,” said a political analyst. “While the project is important, it’s not the President’s job to launch it.
He should be focusing on bigger picture issues, not micromanaging projects that can be handled by his ministers.”
Despite the criticism, Chakwera’s administration has placed emphasis on infrastructure development as a key driver of social and economic growth.
The Vision Malawi 2063 agenda highlights the importance of investing in infrastructure to accelerate development.
However, the approach has been criticized for being too centralized, with the President taking on too much responsibility.
The MHC Headquarters project is just one example of the many initiatives launched by Chakwera’s administration.
While the project is significant, it’s essential to examine the broader implications of the President’s involvement.
Is this a case of the President’s desire for legacy projects overshadowing the need for effective governance and accountability, or is it a genuine attempt to drive development in Malawi? Only time will tell.
 Headquarters has raised eyebrows. While…){kind=link}